Updated August 6, 2021
Brief explanation of why natural immunity is much better than the jab
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer and professor of biology at Simpson University, said while the Delta variant is likely more transmissible, it’s also likely less pathogenic. “What we’re seeing is virus evolution 101,” Hooker said.
“Viruses like to survive, so killing the host (i.e. the human who is infected) defeats the purpose because killing the host kills the virus, too.
“For this reason, new variants of viruses that circulate widely through the population tend to become more transmissive but less pathogenic. In other words, they will spread more easily from person to person, but they will cause less damage to the host.”
Hooker said the more the variant deviates from the original sequence used for the vaccine, the less effective the vaccine will be on that variant, which could explain why fully vaccinated people are getting infected with the Delta variant. But this isn’t the case for natural immunity, he explained.
“The vaccine focuses on the spike protein, whereas natural immunity focuses on the entire virus. Natural immunity — with a more diverse array of antibodies and T-cell receptors — will provide better protection overall as it has more targets in which to attack the virus, whereas vaccine-derived immunity only focuses on one portion of the virus, in this case, the spike protein. Once that portion of the virus has mutated sufficiently, the vaccine no longer is effective.”
Updated July 26, 2021
Federal law protects drug companies from lawsuits when a vaccine kills or injures a child.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) gives drug companies no liability for deaths and injuries that their vaccines cause. The law provides that “[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”
42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1)
As the American Academy of Pediatrics explained it in 1996:
“The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the Act) established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) as a federal “no-fault” compensation system for individuals who may have been injured by specific covered vaccines. Entering its ninth year of operation, the VICP has ensured childhood vaccine supplies by dramatically reducing vaccine companies’ and providers’ liability that threatened the production of vaccines during the 1980s.”
In other words during the 1980s many children were being killed or permanently or significantly injured by vaccines in the U.S., their parents were suing the drug companies for those deaths and injuries, and the drug companies were losing many of those lawsuits. This supposedly, “threatened the production of vaccines during the 1980s.” Congress’ solution was not to require safer or safe vaccines, which it could have. Congress’ solution was to tell the parents, “Hey we are sorry that the vaccine killed or permanently injured your child, either because of defective design, defective manufacture, or inadequate warning and labeling, and to show just how sorry we are we will let you sue in federal vaccine court, and use the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to try and get some money for your loss. Good luck.”
In a 2011 ruling the U.S. Supreme Court in Brusewitz v. Wyeth addressed this issue of drug company liability and the question of whether the NVCIA preempted a civil suit in Pennsylvania state court for damages. Although the Supreme Court did not rule that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”, the NCVIA implicitly acknowledges that they are by its terms. In other words Congress said that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” by passing this Act.
The issue in the case was whether after an adverse decision from the federal vaccine court, the alleged vaccine-injured party could pursue a state law, design-defect lawsuit. The district court dismissed the lawsuit on preemption grounds, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court, per a majority opinion by Justice Scalia, affirmed, holding that all state law, design-defect vaccine injury lawsuits were preempted by the 1986 federal vaccine act.
The Court opinion said:
“The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult. The Act provides that a party alleging a vaccine-related injury may file a petition for compensation in the Court of Federal Claims, naming the Health and Human Services Secretary as the respondent; that the court must resolve the case by a specified deadline; and that the claimant can then decide whether to accept the court’s judgment or reject it and seek tort relief from the vaccine manufacturer. Awards are paid out of a fund created by an excise tax on each vaccine dose. As a quid pro quo, manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections. Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.”
Why would the Act eliminate manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects? Because there are such side effects, and they include death and permanent injury. The Act wouldn’t try to eliminate unavoidable, adverse side effects if they didn’t exist.
Updated July 17, 2021
Regarding that vaccines saved many children from dreaded childhood diseases, that is a common belief but it’s not true. Check out this page.
which quotes this report.
“Vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century – nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among U.S. children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.”
Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century, Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics, December, 2000
Bernard Guyer, Mary Anne Freedman, Donna M. Strobino and Edward J. Sondik
Pediatrics December 2000, 106 (6) 1307-1317; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.6.1307
The decline was due to improvements in safe drinking water and sanitation. Before that, urbanization and the huge rush into the cities created situations with unsafe drinking water and crowded living conditions, which led to lots of infectious diseases.
Interestingly the decline in polio occurred when we (the U.S.) stopped spraying DDT in residential streets.
If you’re interested you could ask your pediatrician friend, anyone who has an account with the American Academy of Pediatrics, to download that file for you.
There was a couple named Polly and (I forget her husband’s name) Tommey whose son, Billy, was fine until he received the MMR vaccine as an infant. It ruined him but did not kill him. They (Polly and her husband) reached out, via the web, to ask if other families had had a similar experience. They were inundated with responses. In the documentary film Vaxxed they said they had 40,000 subscribers within about 4 months. There’s a 4 minute video by Polly on this page.
Updated July 16, 2021
The late Brandy Vaughan was one of the best advocates for good health, accurate information about our health care system, and good public policy that ever lived. She was brilliant as you can tell from her videos.
She made a presentation on September 25, 2016 in San Francisco. This update has some quotations and a partial transcript of that talk. Enjoy reading – but it will make you mad.
Partial transcript starting at 39:18 in the video.
So no other country gives the amount of vaccines that we do as well. Six to nine doses for children, on average, when they go into that doctor’s office. And you know what, the crazy thing? Children don’t even have a developed immune system. It’s still developing. They can’t even initiate the proper response, even if you wanted to argue that vaccines create the right immunity response, which they don’t. Immunity is very complicated and there are many layers to it and it begins here in the nose, eyes, mouth and ears. It doesn’t begin here. There’s no pathway from the arm. So a limited temporary rise in antibodies, yeah that doesn’t uh, that doesn’t confer immunity. Not real immunity. So we’re giving six to nine.
There’s no combination studies. So all vaccine “safe” studies are studies individually, right? They find children that haven’t been vaccinated yet and they test one vaccine. We’re giving them seventy two by age eighteen. You know and, I think that it’s easy for people to understand that when you combine toxic chemicals you have no idea what kind of reactions are gonna happen, right? It increases the toxicity. And we have 4 times more vaccines than in the 80s.
So another thing about children.
We give 26 vaccines by age one year. We, um, clearly if that was healthy we would have the healthiest infant population, right? So we give more infant vaccines than any other country, twenty six. Two in utero, so that would be 28 if the pregnant mother gets the 2 that are recommended. Um, so we would clearly have the healthiest infants, right? Well we don’t. We actually have the highest SIDS rate and the highest infant mortality so, of the developed world. Clearly something’s wrong. So if vaccines are so healthy and they are keeping us alive why do we have the highest infant mortality rate?! Right? And you can, if you look at different countries these countries that have the lowest infant death rate, they have the lowest infant vaccine schedule. This is not a coincidence.
SIDS is not a disease. SIDS is Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. It is a label. A label saying, “We don’t know why this healthy baby just died, right? So we’re gonna label it SIDS.”
But what is the cause? Most of the cases happen within days of, some within hours, of vaccine visits. Of doctor visits. SIDS rates skyrocket 2 months. First day, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months. So I get a lot of time, “Oh that’s just a coincidence, Brandy.” Is it? Then if that’s such a coincidence then why did Save the Children do a report saying that the U.S. has the highest first day death rate in the developed world?! And we are one of the only countries that gives hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted or intravenous drug transmitted illness, like HIV, we give that vaccine within 12 hours of birth in hospitals. It is protocol in the U.S., right? We have the highest first day death rate. It is not that we have lack of medical care, right?
We spend more per (capita) on health care than any other country, developed country. So clearly, you know, it is not a coincidence.
Pharma makes money by keeping us sick.
Docs if they question their entire life crashes down on them.
How are they doing on their quest to keep us sick?
We are one of the sickest developed countires.
1/3 of men and ¼ of women will get cancer.
1/12 women have an auto immue issue.
Common diseases include:
type 1 diabetes
60 million Americans have allergies.
30 million Americans have asthma.
In Europe they think it’s kinda crazy that we’re allergic to the food we eat.
These things didn’t used to happen 30 – 40 years ago, not like it is now.
It’s not normal and it should never be considered normal because it’s a sign of immune system damage.
ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease)
all are skyrocketing.
Cancer is now the leading cause of death in children.
U.S. has some of the highest rates of chronic illness and disorders in the developed world.
It’s not just the food we eat and the air we breathe.
It’s everything we are exposed to.
We are far sicker than most developed countries, despite spending more per capita on health care.
We spend more per capita on health care than any other country in the world.
But it’s the least effective (our health care system).
We are dead last in the developed world despite spending more.
The system is focused on treated symptoms with drugs. We ignore the cause of the problem. We ignore the cause and the root of the issue.
We are the most drugged up country in the world.
Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey
Read the article by Lenny Bernstein, June 16, 2014, in the Washington Post on Once Again the U.S. Has the Most Expensive and Least Effective Health Care System in Survey.
There is no rigorous safety testing for vaccines in the U.S.
No double-blind, placebo based, long term safety testing because they are not classified as pharmaceutical drugs.
34:20 or so
Our children are suffering. Their immune systems are being damaged at skyrocketing rates.
And so that’s why we’re seeing all of these things in our childhood population.
Type 1 diabetes
Cancer, brain cancer
This is exactly where all of those toxic ingredients that are in the vaccines are going.
These are the real epidemics in our country.
A child has to have 35 doses (of vaccines) to go to school in California by age 5.
The current CDC vaccine schedule is for seventy two (72) vaccines, including boosters and everything, through age 18. I mean does anyone in here have 72 vaccines? But we’re all still alive. How is that possible?!
March 23, 2021
I posted this on Facebook on March 22, 2021 and the next day it was gone. I asked the author of the original post if he had deleted it and he said yes he had. OK that’s both reassuring (that it wasn’t FB) and annoying. But it’s good to know.
Feel free to contact me with comments or post your comments here.
facebook sent me a message which I will show at the end of this comment. Unbelievable, their so called “fact checkers”. It’s all propaganda and censorship in service to the vaccine agenda.
This was a comment on a post by Jan Darwin Hutchins.
With all due respect this is myth creation. What would you expect from Banner Health? The va c c in e agenda is vast and pervasive and it can be summed up in a few statements.
(I’ve mixed in some covid specific statements along with the few statements that explain the va c c in e agenda.)
I’m going to write the word as va c c in e because facebook suspends or closes the accounts of users who are critical of the va c c in e agenda. Pardon the euphemism.
The basic flow of the va c c in e agenda is this. If Big Pharma can scare the majority of Americans and trick them into believing that va c c in es are “safe and effective” and that they provide real immunity and save lives, working through the medical establishment and the corporate mass media, then Big Pharma can make huge profits. Their profits will be even bigger if Big Pharma can get the medical establishment to impose va c c in es on unwitting patients (such as parents), and get governments to require va c c in es for their children to attend school,
This can be accomplished with propaganda, false and exaggerated statistics and so on, all delivered through “respectable” authorities like our own government. This can create mass hysteria and frenzy in a gullible population. That’s it. If you understand that then you understand the va c c in e agenda. All the rest are details, and therein lies the proof.
The drug companies earn a TON of money currently from va c c in es and stand to earn many more tons of money through the covid va c c in es. Drug companies have no liability for serious injury or death caused by their va c c in es due to the PREP Act. (Read that one twice. Yes it’s a big deal!)
va c c in es do not undergo the same stringent testing as prescription drugs. The covid va c c in es are not FDA approved. They have not gone through the same type of testing as other va c c in es.
Not thousands, but tens of thousands of parents have had the horrifying experience of a va c c in e frying the mind of their toddler or infant. Meaning irreparable damage in the form of autism. Or death. Within 24 hours of the child getting the MMR va c c in e. (see the documentary film “Vaxxed.”)
The CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) is corrupt and in bed with the drug companies. So is the FDA. The CDC knows that va c c in es kill and seriously injure children.
The VAERS (va c c in e Adverse Event Reporting System) is the government’s way of keeping track of va c c in e injuries or death. It has also been called woefully inadequate and a 2010 study
concluded that only about 1% of va c c in e injuries or deaths are reported to VAERS. VAERS data released on March 19 showed 38,444 reports of adverse events following COVID va c c in es, including 1,739 deaths and 6,286 serious injuries since Dec. 14, 2020.
va c c in es have never ended a pandemic.
The 1918 Spanish flu ended without a va c c in e.
va c c in es did not eradicate diseases in the U.S. Improved sanitation and cleaner drinking water did. The trend had been going on for many years before the first va c c in e.
va c c in es did not eradicate polio. What did is when the government and companies stopped spraying DDT on people and on our food.
The World Health Organization views vaccines as a business rather than as a health issue, in at least one very revealing slide presentation.
Anything injected directly into the body bypasses the body’s detoxification system known as the digestive system, plus the kidneys and so on. Our bodies are designed to filter our harmful things (let’s call them poisons), but a shot in the arm bypasses that
Covid presents the ideal opportunity for Big Pharma to get hundreds of millions of people to take a new va c c in e. Sometimes two doses. Maybe more. Rarely is any of these free.
The covid va c c in es use an unprecedented (never before used in a va c c in e) mRNA technology. I’m not a scientist or very familiar with it, but it IS different. To brush this off as if this is the same as other va c c in es is just propaganda.
Soon after covid started the CDC and many states (maybe all 50) changed the way they identify the cause of death when a person dies. This was done in violation of federal laws such as the administrative procedures act, and generally was done with no public input or Congressional OK. A person who tests positive for covid and dies (from anything, like heart disease, cancer, you name it) is considered a covid casualty. This is a significant change and it has the effect of exaggerating the true number of deaths caused by covid. It is not an accident either.
The number of regular flu deaths has dropped dramatically since the pandemic began.
The corporate mass media, medical establishment and government, all in service to Big Pharma, have paid little to no attention to the body’s immune system and ways to protect and strengthen it. And to inexpensive supplements or medications or over the counter drugs that can strengthen the immune system and / or protect against covid. They give it lip service and only very rarely.
As a friend put it recently, all of the stories in the news today are either about va c c in es, weather or sports. That’s it. CNN devotes half their home page or more to va c c in es, a permanent feature.
For those who will trust their life on a scientific study, check this out.
Marcia Angell wrote, “ It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical
guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (1)
Dr. Richard Horton, at the time the editor in chief of The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal, wrote in 2015:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming.”
Here is the message that facebook sent me, in response to my comment which has been deleted.
Your Post Is Missing ContextIndependent fact-checkers at Science Feedback say information in your post is missing context and could mislead people. We’ve added a notice to your post.
SCIENCE FEEDBACKFact-CheckVAERS reports of adverse events in people who received COVID-19 vaccines don’t demonstrate that these events were caused by the vaccines; evidence does not indicate COVID-19 vaccines caused Bell’s palsy and deaths – Health FeedbackBoth COVID-19 vaccines approved for emergency use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were thoroughly reviewed for safety and efficacy before approval. The U.S. Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) enables the public and healthcare providers to report adverse events that occur after vaccinat…All fact-checkers who partner with Facebook must be signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network and follow their Code of Principles.Learn more about how Facebook works with independent fact-checkers to stop the spread of false information.
The facts can be checked, compared to reliable sources. Each person brings his or her own beliefs about the medical system to this debate, or this issue. For many people vaccines seem like a matter of faith, not dependent on facts. I think that is delusional thinking. The inconvenient truth is that Big Pharma is using covid to scare us away from reasonable health measures and into accepting vaccines. They have a blatant conflict of interest and vested interest in doing that.
Recently I saw something where schools in one state were going to open and only require 3′ distance in between children. There was an expert of some kind in a short video clip who said, “There was never a scientific basis for 6 foot separation anyway.” Unbelievable. They play fast and loose with the facts, adjusting and replacing them as needed. Dr. Fauci does this too. He is nothing more than a salesman, like a used car salesman. He has no integrity in my opinion.